Will Sharia Law Replace Our Constitution

Political Disconnect

"All The News That's Fit To Print"

Blog Archive

Monday, September 21, 2009

Mind Control - America Is Well On Its Way

Have The Thought Police Arrived?



George Orwell’s 1984 - Tomorrow’s America?


By Don White
George Orwell, author of 1984 and other novels was really Eric Blair who lived in England and India from 1903 to 1950. He was in poor health when he came back to England. He had worked for the Indian Imperial Police in Burma, but wanted to become a writer, and he was living in poverty when he wrote his first book, Down and Out in Paris and London (1933).

Then he did something dramatic. He joined the Republican forces in the Spanish Civil War and wrote of his experience in Homage to Catalonia (1938). Critics called it one of the most moving accounts ever written of this war. It was then that he decided he would speak out against tyranny – domination of any person over another. He condemned totalitarianism in a brilliantly witty allegorical fable Animal Farm (1945) and in what he meant to be a satirical novel, 1984.

Orwell wrote his last novel in 1949 and he died a year later. It is about his worst fears, events and conditions that he felt would come about in the world, especially in Great Britain and America, twenty-five years later. I posit that this is rapidly becoming reality. A world that dreamed about freedom and cherished it is getting stiffed by its leaders and shackled by Orwellian nightmares that each of us can see here in America if we would but open our eyes.

What Are Some of Those Orwellian Nightmares:

Winston Smith lived in rotting city tenement housing. On each floor of the house was a large poster of an enormous face more than a meter wide. It was of a man of about forty-five, with a heavy black mustache and ruggedly handsome features. It was a picture so contrived that the eyes followed you about when you moved. The caption below read, “Big Brother is Watching You.” Does that remind us of Stalin and Communist Russia? And what has it to do with the false adoration of Barak Obama?

In the distance a helicopter of the Police Patrol skimmed down between the roofs, snooping into people’s windows, hovering for an instant and darting away. But Orwell said the helicopters didn’t matter, only the Thought Police mattered.”

The black-mustachio’d face gazed down from every commanding corner outside and the picture’s dark eyes “looked deep into Winston’s own.”

Government had turned off the electricity to the lifts (elevators) in the start of the winter as an economy drive “in preparation for Hate Week” and the building seemed cold. There was power inside the flats and each contained a “telescreen.”  Winston’s was babbling away about pig iron and the over-fulfillment of the Ninth Three-Year Plan. Sometimes the machine played strident military music.

The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously and any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it. As long as he remained within the field of vision that the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. But there was no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment.

“How often, or on what system the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. . . You had to live . . . from habit that became instinct – in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.”

A kilometer away the Ministry of Truth, where Winston worked, towered vast and wide above the grimy landscape.

He lived in London that had become part of the provinces of Oceania. “He tried to squeeze out some childhood memory that should tell him whether London had always been quite like this. Were there always these vistas of rotting nineteenth-century houses, their sides shored up with balks of timber, their windows patched with cardboard and their roofs with corrugated iron, their crazy garden walls sagging in all directions?” Then he described the bombed sites – where had sprung up sordid colonies of wooden dwellings like chicken houses.

Is this bad enough, or do you want more?

Do you want to know that not only had a free country been transformed from freedom to slavery, from strength to ignorance, from a prosperous English-speaking nation to a poor province of a One World Order speaking what Orwell calls “Newspeak,” the official language of Oceania. Are you concerned that there as a Ministry of Truth, spewing out the state’s version of news, entertainment, education, and the fine arts; the Ministry of Peace, which had to do with war; the Ministry of Love, which maintained law and order; and the Ministry of Plenty, which was responsible for economic affairs. Their names in Newspeak were Minitrue, Minipax, Miniluv, and Miniplenty.

It was a country without laws. That meant there were no courts, no defenses for allegations of sedition or wrongdoing. The only law, the only lawlessness, was what the Ministry of Truth saw you do and decided in their infinite wisdom to punish you for, such as sedition, and then you could be sent away for 25 years in a forced labor camp.

Contrast that with what we have here in America today.
Even though we are told this nation is just coming out of recession, we have almost ten percent unemployment – or sixteen percent – depending on who you believe. We have the world’s best health care, though there are maybe seven million without health care. We can come and go as we please. We live in a land of law and order, with rights protected by our Constitution, but which rights are constantly being eroded by a high- spending, far left Congress and a president who, like Bush and Clinton before him, is a New World Order advocate who vows to level our economic playing field – make the rich poor and the poor temporarily better off. But for how long?

It was Jesus Christ who said the poor will always be with us.

Today, America has a far left liberal president who has said over and over again two things: He would bring fundamental change and the U.S. Constitution is flawed.

Yet he and his first Supreme Court Judge appointment, Sonja Sotomayor, raised their hands to the square, pledging to uphold the Constitution of the United States. “The Constitution,” not something he and she want to transform it into. But remember, both are deceptive. Truth means very little to these people. People who do not practice a Judeo-Christian faith seem to have a tough time recognizing truth and adhering to it. As President Clinton said when trying to defend himself in the Monica Lewinski sex scandal, “It depends on what the (current) definition of is is.”

They come from liberal schools of thought – oh, not all, but enough to draw a distinction.  They are usually trained at Ivy League universities, seemingly well respected schools, that teach the Constitution is a living document, meaning it needs to be changed to fit the times. I used to admire the Harvard man, the man from Yale, Columbia or Princeton. Even bright conservatives sent their children to those schools and now I wonder why?

Why did I admire them and now I don’t?


If I see that someone’s bio includes training from these schools, now I say beware! They are not to be trusted as far as their feelings for our Constitution because their minds have been tainted by liberals profs, associates, and friends. That is probably why even young people from Utah, the Midwest, and other conservative areas of America go east with high, resume-enhancing, and prideful expectations.

These liberal schools graduate many liberal-minded people. They will find jobs and live like other liberal young adults until they grow old and remember their conservative backgrounds and training in the home. Though I didn’t go east for my education, like many of you I was trained at a liberal state school that had liberal profs. It is only later in life, when we start thinking for ourselves, that we question this New World Order of thinking, a deadly virus that if kept unchecked will surely destroy our American way of life and our Constitution. It is already happening.

All the presidents of the past 50 years have been New World Order people, bent on destroying America. Bent on destroying Constitutional government and replacing it with some form of socialism, fascism, stateism, big government, and a Constitution that can be changed willy-nilly by the next nitwit who comes along.  That is in direct contrast, however, to what they vowed to uphold.

Obama admires Hugo Chavez, even read his new book. When Obama nationalized the auto industry Chavez whispered to Fidel Castro, look at him, man. He’s so far left he’s making us look like moderates.

Not to be outdone, the next thing Chavez does is nationalize all of the radio stations in Venezuela, forty of them, and the television outlets, all but one which is his propaganda machine.

Will Obama follow suit, and would he attempt to shut down the Internet? Read about this at NewsMax: http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_internet_fcc/2009/09/20/262385.html

I said that to a young man of my faith who is studying computer programming. He looked at me like I was crazy. “They’d never do that, the people would rebel,” he said.

But do the people rebel when the mainline media supports Obama’s every illegal move?

Do we have to wait until one fine morning when we realize we are all living in 1984?

  • One Party-line Communications: It’s already here and Obama only has to take down one network, Fox. All but Fox bowed to Obama on Sunday, yesterday, September 20, 2009, by allowing him to spew his healthcare propaganda across America for the umpteenth time. Fox, which is also peppered with New World Order commentators and contributors, would have given him time, but he didn’t request it. It’s the same old story, but his effort was not to pick up conservative Republican votes, but to solidify his own party’s vote for this massive boondoggle which he will soon ram through Congress, like it or not. Many Congressmen do not because they know it may mean the end of their political careers in the 2010 elections because the people have spoken – we don’t want government healthcare and Obama’s bill stinks.
·        Everyone Will Belong To A Union: Our economy and millions of workers will soon suffer greatly under the scourge of compulsory unionism. Card Check will allow unions to force workers to join by doing away with secret ballots.
President Mark Mix of the National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation was published in the Detroit News discussing how union boss monopoly bargaining is bankrupting Detroit’s public schools -- pointing out the reality that "[t]he Detroit school district would be much better off if state legislators and [Michigan] Gov. Jennifer Granholm repealed or dramatically rolled back state policies promoting union monopoly bargaining in public schools."
Mix also was published on National Review Online exposing the stunning resemblance forced unionism has to the dirty tricks Obama pulled in launching his political career.
Other Signs of a Decaying America:
·        Confiscating money and resources. This is done by high taxes, fines on small businesses and people for failure to buy onto Obama’s Health Care Plan and the attendant taxes and high cost of utilities because of Cap and Trade, the energy bill that Congress has already passed.

Eliminating Freedoms – A Constitution Under Siege:
·        Speech, assembly, religion, and guns
·        Taking of powers reserved to the people and states, such as regulating everything. We even have a regulator in the FCC, Mark Lloyd, who will try to tax the heck out of radio and television stations until they go under. I say try to because these acts are unconstitutional and the networks, we hope, will fight back in court. Believe it or not, some networks won’t fight Big Brother because they know Rahm Emanuel and the president are keeping score. They have an enemies list.

·        Obama has already seized control of the auto industry and all aspects of America’s financial industry under the federal central bank, the Federal Reserve, which will be complicit in the failing of America.

·        Double-digit – maybe triple digit – inflation
This will be brought about by the devaluation of the dollar. Commodities and food will become so expensive you will wish you lived on a farm or had a vegetable garden. With each new spending bill comes the printing of new money and loss of respect from our financial partners. China will have had it up to here with us and won’t lend additional money. They are about there right now.

  • A Reich-blitz Fire Storm That Will Enable Obama to Become A Complete Dictator. Check out the Michael Savage Video.
Currently Obama and the democrats are little dictators. But the dictatorship will be seen as growing too slowly, so the far left liberals under the direction of Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, pulling Obama’s strings, will invent a national emergency that in the minds of Obama will demand a complete takeover of all government, ousting Congressmen, marginalizing state governments if not abolishing them altogether. He will use blood and terror to get his way and the military and his hundred thousand community organizers to force compulsion.

Then is when America will look very Orwellian. It will be 1984 in reality and we will suffer as a people, that is those who fail to oppose it and are not willing to give up their lives in defense of their country. Obama will be acting as a dictator under a directive signed for just such emergencies by the past president, George Bush, who didn’t in his wildest dreams envision two men as evil as Emanuel and Obama using his stupid little directive to destroy America. Or did he?




http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_internet_fcc/2009/09/20/262385.html

Friday, September 18, 2009

Bush Was A Damned Liberal, Let's Face It!

I made a comment after reading columnist Byron York's fine article found in the Washington Examiner.com. I said Bush was a "damned" liberal on Constitutional freedom, the economy, and the borders. He was only conservative when it came to attacking the people who knocked down the Trade Centers in New York. Or was he, because if he was he should have attacked Saudi Arabia and looked for WMDs there. Don White

The following Noah Webster quote is even better:

Wise Words: 2nd Amendment

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States". Noah Webster, An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, 1787


Bush 43: Conservative movement is inconsequential

By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
September 15, 2009

Former President George W. Bush addresses a Fourth of July crowd at the Let Freedom Ring 2009 festival at Crystal Beach Park Arena in Woodward, Okla., Saturday, July 4, 2009. (AP Photo)
How many times during the last eight years did you hear that George W. Bush was a dangerous right-wing extremist? Probably too many to count.
What you heard less often were expressions of the deep reservations some conservatives felt about Bush's governing philosophy.
Conservatives greatly admired Bush for his steadfastness in the War on Terror -- to use that outlawed phrase -- and they were delighted by his choices of John Roberts and Samuel Alito for the Supreme Court. But when it came to a fundamental conservative principle like fiscal discipline, many conservatives felt the president just wasn't with them.
You saw that throughout the 2008 Republican presidential primaries, when GOP candidates, while not mentioning Bush specifically, got big applause from conservative Republican audiences by pledging to return fiscal responsibility to the White House.
Those cheering conservatives will find a revealing moment in a new book, scheduled for release next week, by former White House speechwriter Matt Latimer.
Latimer is a veteran of conservative politics. An admirer of Republican Sen. Jon Kyl, for whom he worked for several years, Latimer also worked in the Rumsfeld Pentagon before joining the Bush White House in 2007.
The revealing moment, described in "Speechless: Tales of a White House Survivor," occurred in the Oval Office in early 2008.
Bush was preparing to give a speech to the annual meeting of the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC. The conference is the event of the year for conservative activists; Republican politicians are required to appear and offer their praise of the conservative movement.
Latimer got the assignment to write Bush's speech. Draft in hand, he and a few other writers met with the president in the Oval Office. Bush was decidedly unenthusiastic.
"What is this movement you keep talking about in the speech?" the president asked Latimer.
Latimer explained that he meant the conservative movement -- the movement that gave rise to groups like CPAC.
Bush seemed perplexed. Latimer elaborated a bit more. Then Bush leaned forward, with a point to make.
"Let me tell you something," the president said. "I whupped Gary Bauer's ass in 2000. So take out all this movement stuff. There is no movement."
Bush seemed to equate the conservative movement -- the astonishing growth of conservative political strength that took place in the decades after Barry Goldwater's disastrous defeat in 1964 -- with the fortunes of Bauer, the evangelical Christian activist and former head of the Family Research Council whose 2000 presidential campaign went nowhere.
Now it was Latimer who looked perplexed. Bush tried to explain.
"Look, I know this probably sounds arrogant to say," the president said, "but I redefined the Republican Party."
The Oval Office is no place for a low-ranking White House staffer to get into an argument with the president of the United States about the state of the Republican Party -- or about any other subject, for that matter. Latimer made the changes the president wanted. When Bush appeared at CPAC, he made no mention of the conservative movement. In fact, he said the word "conservative" only once, in the last paragraph.
Bush veterans are going to take issue with some of Latimer's criticisms in "Speechless." As an observer of it all, I certainly don't agree with his characterizations of some Bush administration officials. But looking back at the Bush years, the scene in the Oval Office adds context to the debate that is going on inside conservative circles today.
Right after the Republican Party's across-the-board defeat last November, there was a wave of what-went-wrong self-analysis. Republicans were divided between those who believed the party had lost touch with conservative principles and those who believed it had failed to adapt to changed political and demographic circumstances.
Bush's words in the Oval Office speak directly to that first group. You can argue whether Bush was a fiscal conservative at any time in his political career, but he certainly wasn't in the White House. And some real fiscal conservatives, with their guy in charge, held their tongues.
Now, with unified Democratic control of the presidency and both houses of Congress, we're seeing spending that makes Bush's record look downright thrifty. Republicans have again found their voice on fiscal discipline. And some of them wish they had been more outspoken when a president of their own party was in the White House.
Byron York, The Examiner's chief political correspondent, can be contacted at byork@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears on Tuesday and Friday, and his stories and blog posts appears on www.ExaminerPolitics.com ExaminerPolitics.com.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Iran Outfoxes UN - Delays Talks, Nixes Nuclear Agenda

Geopolitical Intelligence Report Share This Report

This is FREE intelligence for distribution. Forward this to your colleagues.

Misreading the Iranian Situation

The Iranians have now agreed to talks with the P-5+1, the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council (the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia and China) plus Germany. These six countries decided in late April to enter into negotiations with Iran over the suspected Iranian nuclear weapons program by Sept. 24, the date of the next U.N. General Assembly meeting. If Iran refused to engage in negotiations by that date, the Western powers in the P-5+1 made clear that they would seriously consider imposing much tougher sanctions on Iran than those that were currently in place. The term “crippling” was mentioned several times.
Obviously, negotiations are not to begin prior to the U.N. General Assembly meeting as previously had been stipulated. The talks are now expected to begin Oct. 1, a week later. This gives the Iranians their first (symbolic) victory: They have defied the P-5+1 on the demand that talks be under way by the time the General Assembly meets. Inevitably, the Iranians would delay, and the P-5+1 would not make a big deal of it.

Talks About Talks and the Sanctions Challenge

Now, we get down to the heart of the matter: The Iranians have officially indicated that they are prepared to discuss a range of strategic and economic issues but are not prepared to discuss the nuclear program — which, of course, is the reason for the talks in the first place. On Sept. 14, they hinted that they might consider talking about the nuclear program if progress were made on other issues, but made no guarantees.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Obama Date Cost Americans A Million Bucks


Subject: Fwd: Cost of a Date
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:33:56 -0400
From: tigershaw@aol.com
To:

Subject: Cost of a Date

Some dinner date!

Cost Of A Date - A Million Bucks!

From a former Air Force Colonel....

Subject: The Date

First, let me say that I've moved three presidents up
to now and I've seen incredible waste. But, the "new" guy
really takes the cake. I don't have an issue with the
President promising his wife dinner and a show or that he
even takes his wife out.

But, when I saw the news say that the date cost
$24,000, here's what you DON'T know.

Three days before "dinner" a C-17 flew Marines and the
helicopter maintenance equipment to JFK Airport .

The day before "dinner" I flew the USSS and the
motorcade to JFK Airport

Our crew of 5 spent two days and nights at the Hilton
in Times Square . My hotel bill: $621.66 plus $64 a day in
per diem. The USSS guys were at a different Hilton in NYC,
so figure that cost another $14,000 (or so) plus per diem.
The Marines had to have cost as much and were there four
days, so figure another $55,000 plus per diem (for 44
Marines).

We were supposed to fly the motorcade back and go home,
but the Air Force was so short of C-17's that we were
re-tasked to take the motorcade back, return to JFK and take
the helicopter back to Quantico .

When we got back to JFK, while the pilot was turning
the plane around to park, he noticed a rotor blade sticking
out of the hangar where the helicopter was parked and
informed me that either it wasn't ready to transport or it
was flying home. After shutting down I walked over to the
hangar and to my surprise I find FIVE helicopters, not ONE.

We're obviously not transporting five big helicopters.
I went and talked to the Marines guarding the "fleet" and
found that they were flying all five helicopters home and we
were only transporting the Marines and the maintenance
equipment. After talking to the Marine(s) in charge, I was
told that the White House requested FIVE helicopters. The
Marines told me that they spent all morning trying to figure
out how much it cost them to come and said they figured it
cost them $140,000 to stay there (I don't know where they
came up with that)and the trip's total had to be about
$1,000,000.
We heard that the President didn't use Air Force One
(the 747) so I asked if he came in on one of the 757's. I
was told that he came in on THREE Air Force Lear jets.
So, date night consisted of: 2 C-17's flying three
missions, 3 Lear jets, 5 Helicopters,

Presidential Motorcade, 44 Marines, more than 20 USSS
personnel on our plane. Who knows what it cost the NYPD
and NY Port Authority (at the airport) in overtime.

These are the same people that chastised the automobile
CEO's for using their aircraft. It further proves that the
media only uses the facts that make the President look good and hides any facts that will detract from his persona..

Is this the 'change' we expected?
Talk with friends and those who are not blinded by
charisma. Many folks I know who voted for Obama are very disappointed and sorry they did so.

The Emperor's clothes on a grand scale. "Transparency"?
Remember, 2010 is just around the corner. All we have to
do is survive long enough.

Friday, September 4, 2009

Obama Is Boning Up On Post-American Book By a Muslim Friend

A FRIGHTENING PHOTO
This will open your eyes.. What does Obama read?


The name of the book Obama is reading is called The Post-American World, written by a fellow muslim. Post-America - The world After America ??? &n bsp;

Please forward this picture to everyone you know, conservative or liberal to expose Obama's radical ideas and intent for this country!
photo verified by snopes

HUB Pages

Digital Clock and Calendar For Blogger 4.0

Loading...

Labels

Slideshow

Loading...

Video Bar

Loading...

United We Stand, Divided...

United We Stand, Divided...

The White House

Welcome To Political Disconnect

Here is where we hope to inform you about everthing that affects your life. This is a conservative blog, but we welcome all opinions and persuasions. There is a disconnect in a Democratic controlled Congress--a Washington that doesn't care about the common man, meaning me and you. But the problems of America are broader than one party. The best thing that could happen is that you make comments on this blog. What is it you want? There must be a thousand bloggers that will agree with you and a thousand more that won't. It doesn't matter. What matters is that you voice your opinion. BLOG!

Video Bar

Loading...

Your Chance To Vote For Or Against Georgia

PayPerPost, Inc

PPP Direct

My Blog List

Bangladesh Blogger

Video Bar

Loading...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=PcsN_-2zBWo

Loading...

Video Bar

Loading...

Peter G. Peterson

Peter G. Peterson
Peterson does not have good things to say about the financial mess we are left with when Bush returns to Crawford, Texas next January

Michelle Malkin, Writer

Michelle Malkin, Writer
Why Does the Liberal Media Always Give Obama a Pass?

Communicate

I hope this gives our blog site third party functionality so that users can optimize their time here. Don White

Video Bar

Loading...
free hit counter
Visit the free hit counters image gallery.